Forward

Showing posts with label audience engagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label audience engagement. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2016

Werther Post-Show Discussion Questions

Sandra Piques Eddy and Alex Richardson in Werther.
Photo: T. Charles Erickson
Did you see BLO's production of Werther? Don't let the music just fade away! Consider these thought-provoking discussion questions with the friends or loved ones who attended the opera with you. After all, art is meant to be shared.


1.    Consider the production concept, directorial approach, and design elements of the opera. In what ways did these enhance, or detract from, your overall experience?

2.    How does Werther’s obsession and emotional state color his memories of the characters and events leading up to his suicide? How does the production reflect this?

3.    Charlotte is often described by other characters as good, angelic, pure. Do her actions throughout the opera justify this assessment? Why or why not?

4.    Why does Werther feel that suicide is his only option?

5.    How does Massenet’s music throughout the opera enhance the emotional content of the drama? Which moments stood out in particular, and why?

6.    Goethe wrote The Sorrows of Young Werther based on his own romantic experiences and those of people that he knew—including a young man who had killed himself after being rejected by a married woman. What are the ethics of this type of appropriation? Does the story glamorize suicide? Does the opera itself?

7.    Why would Massenet choose to juxtapose the children singing “Noel” as Werther dies in the final scene? Was it effective for you, and why or why not?

8.    Read the blog post regarding the added vocal lines in this production, written by David Angus, BLO Music Director and Conductor of Werther. Did you notice this moment in the opera? How did it enhance the final scene between Werther and Charlotte—or is the drama better served by leaving it out? Why?

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Opera Expectations


Before interning with Boston Lyric Opera, I had no exposure to opera. However, working behind-the-scenes during Macbeth allowed me to learn what opera is really about through I a story I already knew. I broke through many of the preconceived notions I held about the opera.

These are a few of the misconceptions about the opera that I had:

“I won’t be able to understand an opera because I don’t know {insert language here}.”
When I attended the new Broadway production of West Side Story, in which Spanish lyrics were incorporated, I felt concerned about seeing a show in another language. I know everything about West Side Story and I studied Spanish for five years, yet I left feeling confused. How could I appreciate and enjoy an opera I know nothing about, told in a language I don’t understand? However, my fears were assuaged when I learned many opera companies project English translations (called supertitles) on screens during the performance, allowing the audience to follow the story and appreciate the amazing vocal talent. Additionally, there are operas composed in English, like Peter Maxwell Davies’ The Lighthouse, which BLO will produce in February as this season’s Opera Annex.

“Opera is just a bunch of people singing. Only people with intense vocal training can really appreciate it.”
When I first entered the Citi Performing Arts CenterSM Shubert Theatre for Macbeth, I initially noticed the display of bodies hanging from the ceiling of the stage. The scenery was awe-inspiring. Don’t get me wrong; opera is about the amazing vocal talent. However, it is also a performance, which makes it a theatrical experience.

I have a bit of vocal training, (as much as high-school chorale can provide), enabling me to appreciate how talented and well-trained the singers are. However, even someone who has never sung a note would be impressed.

“Operas are so long!”
Although many operas run longer than a typical movie, musical or play, an opera production tends to have more intermissions. Although the run time of an opera performance may be four hours, the audience isn’t expected to stay seated the entire time. There are two to three intermissions! This provides time for the audience to stretch their legs, visit the restroom, grab a snack and get excited to experience the rest of the show.

“I don’t think opera is my thing.”
If one has never seen an opera, how does one know? Take a chance; Carpe Diem!

Attending the opera is a unique and interesting experience that enriches the individual. While it may be a new and scary experience for many, I encourage everyone to take a chance and try something new, see an opera! I think you’ll figure out for yourself if it really “ain’t over till the fat lady sings.”

-- Elyssa Sternberg, Boston University ‘15

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Tis the season!

Please join BLO and your fellow Bostonians this Thursday (12/1) at the 70th Annual Boston Common Tree Lighting when two of our 2011/2012 Emerging Artists Michelle Trainor and David Cushing will sing a few holiday selections to warm the crowd!
The event is scheduled from 6 to 8pm, with Michelle and David singing around 6:15pm.
For more information, visit the full event listing
Happy Holidays!

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

the wilder things at Macbeth

Charlotte Wilder, creator and author of the wilder things, attended our production of Macbeth and as an ardent classical music and opera fan, shares her thoughts with us.

Wilder Happenings: Boston Lyric Opera's "MacBeth" 

(and what one wears to go see it)
Opera is in my blood. Literally. My grandfather Hugo Weisgall was a composer who wrote over ten operas; his last, Esther, was the season opener for New York City Opera's reopening in 2009. It therefore follows that I grew up listening to opera and classical music (my parents met when my father studied music with Hugo). In fact, when I was in elementary school the only music I listened to was classical, with the exceptions of big band jazz and the occasional Beatles or Rolling Stones album. You can imagine how embarassing it must have been to live through the Spice Girls and not know it, but that's for another post. I can assure you I'm more up-to-date these days. 

Thursday, November 10, 2011

For the first time ever: BLO Exposed!

An intermission conversation series designed to bring you closer to the opera


On November 9 we held the first installment of BLO Exposed, featuring BLO Music Director David Angus in conversation with artists from Macbeth live from the stage. We took questions from the audience, who tweeted us their questions. (@BostLyricOpera)

Talking with Carter Scott (Lady Macbeth)
Tell us a bit about being an opera singer. What does it take to become a real singer?
I went through years of training: voice lessons, coaching, auditions, in addition to school and grad school. I continue to receive coaching and will throughout my career. My voice teacher attended the Final Dress Rehearsal, who was so insightful from dress rehearsal to opening that helped me make many wonderful adjustments to my performance. I've never had a voice teacher so involved before.
What do you think of the color yellow as the representation of hell?
Perhaps it was chosen because it contrasts so much with the red, I’m not sure.
What is the most challenging part of singing the role of Lady Macbeth?
The stamina! In this production, we’ve condensed the first two acts. You can sing an aria, but can you sing the whole show for five performances?

Talking with Kurt Hakansso
n (Supernumerary)
Supernumeraries (known as supers) are non-singing roles who volunteer to be a part of the show. They do it for nothing! Why?
How can you not love being in a theater like this, being surrounded by people like here? It’s incredible for you to hear, but even more for me to hear being surrounded by 40+ singers. Got started as a super years ago with La Boheme.
How does it feel being onstage with those creepy body bags?
I get to poke out the eyes and carry them around; it’s gruesome and fun.
How many shows have you been in with BLO?
This is my 9th show. The most challenging moment is the synchronized stomp, watching David in the pit.
 

Talking with Marie McCarville (Chorister)
Tell us a bit about your training and background.
I didn’t realize I’d end up living in Boston for so many years. I started at Oberlin in Ohio and then moved back to NY to be near my family. I wanted to sing more, so I applied to NEC and got accepted, which enabled me to audition for BLO. And I have been a proud member of the BLO since ‘07 La Boheme.
Do you think the chorus witches are meant to be undead zombie like creatures?
The director and choreographer told us: this is YOUR show—make YOUR character whomever you want it to be, so I chose to be a sociopath who likes to wear a lot of tribal makeup, but the witch to my left prefers to consider herself to be a zombie.
Tell us about what it is like to be backstage?
It’s way smaller than you think! You look at the stage and you think it’s huge, but it’s not! This is where you really start to bond with your castmates. Especially since you see us all wearing this warm leather and undergarments, I never expected it to be so hot back there, when you have a 38-person chorus ready to jump up on stage, you really need to stay hydrated.

----------------
Thank you for all your fabulous questions! We received so many questions we didn’t have time to answer, so we’ll answer more of them over the next few days here on the blog. We hope you enjoyed the first ever BLO Exposed and look forward to hearing from you at the next intermission conversation!


You can you join the conversation:
1) Tell us YOUR BLO story. We can't wait to hear from you. (yourblo@blo.org)
2) Tweet your questions to @BostLyricOpera using the hashtag #BLOexposed
3) LIKE us on Facebook and post your question there!

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

BLO Exposed

An intermission conversation series designed to bring you closer to the opera

Join us on November 9 for the first installment featuring BLO Music Director David Angus in conversation with artists from Macbeth live from the stage. No need to go anywhere special—just stay in your seat during intermission and let this insider access come to you. You can even join the conversation on Facebook and Twitter.

To join the conversation:
1) Tweet your questions to @BostLyricOpera using the hashtag #BLOexposed
2) LIKE us on Facebook and post your question there!

We hope you’ll join us during intermission!

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Loving that $3.50 ticket!

With so many great shows playing in the Boston area, and most only playing for a week or so, it’s hard to decide which ones to see and which ones to forgo … what’s a girl to do? On Friday night it came down to two shows for my friend Regina and I, one of them being BLO’s Macbeth. When we saw on BLO’s facebook page that they were selling a limited number of tickets for $3.50 in honor of the 35th Anniversary Season we knew that was a deal that we couldn’t pass up. We arrived at the Shubert at around 6pm, nervous that there were already 35 people in line in front of us–but we made it in time! We were about 10th or so in line and were able to get excellent seats (Orch Row B, seats 9 and 11) … but couldn’t believe we only had to pay $3.50 for a ticket. With our tickets now in hand, we went to grab a quick dinner before the show and arrived at the theatre for the 7:30pm curtain, and were still amazed at how close our seats were. From our seats we were able to appreciate the intricacies of the costumes and set pieces, and really tune in to all of the action onstage. Regina mentioned how much she loved the opportunity to experience the opera at such a great price: “It was an economical, enriching choice for a Friday night and now that I have been, I will definitely attend another show." When given the option of all these great productions it is hard to know if you made the right choice, but you definitely cannot beat awesome seats to such a great production for only $3.50!

--Katie McNamara, Emerson College

Thursday, October 27, 2011

SEIZE THE POWER - OK, BUT THEN WHAT DO YOU DO WITH IT? (Part 2)


By, BLO Artistic Advisor John Conklin

In the end, is what the artist meant important? The production result (not the process or even the intent) is what matters. Good artists work on many levels within themselves and often (thank God) produce work that they may not completely understand. Accepted ambiguity can provide meaning, stimulation, involvement. (It can also, of course, in less skilled hands produce uninteresting muddle.) A group of artists producing an opera on the stage creates a stimulus—the stage production. They need to commit themselves totally to the evolution of that stimulus through discussion, conceptual thinking, research, but they must, in the end, give it over to the recipients, the members of the audience. The artists in a sense lose control, but that is the glory and often the misery of being an artist. You don’t own the piece any more—your audience member now does. Is it possible for an artist to be misunderstood or misinterpreted? This is a question that goes to the heart of the artistic exchange.

Personal anecdotal case study number two: After a performance of Don Giovanni, which I designed, I was accosted by a audience member—red in the face, veins throbbing. I thought, “Oh, great, now I’m going to cause the death of an irate operagoer.” He sputtered, “I didn’t understand ANYTHING that you did in that production. Was Giovanni in a wheelchair because he had syphilis?” He went on and on. After a bit I gently stopped him gently, “Sir, you said you didn’t understand anything, and here you have just give a quite thorough and detailed explanations of what it meant—to you.” “But is that what you meant?” “That makes no difference.” (Actually his explanation of Giovanni’s wheelchair was a completely new thought for me, and in some ways a more interesting interpretation than what the director and I had discussed.) Pause. The furious red drained away. As he walked slowly away, he said, “Maybe I should go back and see this again.”

I had somehow given him permission to have his own thoughts, interpretation, to OWN the production for himself, which was his right... and responsibility. The power to take over and experience a piece in your mind is a joy and a rush. We live in culture which tells us all the time what to think and what things mean—critical reviews, experts’ comments, labels on pictures in museum which explain what to think. Fear of being wrong, fear of appearing stupid, colors people’s reactions and make them passive receptors. We as producers need to make each audience member unafraid, to give the control back to them.

Friday, October 21, 2011

TO THE AUDIENCE--SEIZE THE POWER (Part 1)

By, BLO Artistic Advisor John Conklin

This is an excerpt from an article I wrote for Opera America Magazine. I am very interested in the "problem" of how an audience member might approach an opera performance--whether for the first time or the 50th--whether a standard repertory piece or a new or unfamiliar work. Do you need to "prepare"? .... and if so how?  I'd love to have your feedback on these questions or others raised in the article. Let's get a discussion going here.  Next week, another excerpt.

With the coming of projected supertitles, the somewhat ridiculous notion of having to do “homework” before attending a foreign language opera performance should have receded. In those far-off days before titles, what was one actually supposed to do? Study a detailed but inevitably too generalized synopsis of the action (insufficient) or memorize the libretto’s text by heart (impossible)? The theatrical experience is a moment-to-moment accumulation of words, visual images, sounds, music, narrative action and psychological development given from the stage and received by any given audience member in a detailed and complicated exchange.

But with the growth of opera company education departments (ostensibly a positive development) this notion of homework has, if anything, become more pervasive. I myself have put together a number of programs designed to somehow prepare people for a production. Is this a good thing?

Personal anecdotal case study number one: I attended a performance at English National Opera of Nicholas Hytner’s production of Handel’s Xerxes. I was familiar with Handel’s stage works in general but I didn’t know at that point any of the specifics of this one. I had read no reviews, I deliberately avoided looking at any of the publicity pictures, I didn’t read the synopsis in the program or even look at the cast of characters. I was thrown into the midst of a complicated plot whose character relationships I had to work out as they came up. Plot twists, betrayals, misunderstandings were surprising, unexpected, sometimes shocking. The opera was sung in English and, this being the era before titles, you were compelled to really listen to what they were saying ... at the moment. The design and the staging were complicated, witty and allusive—unexpectedly combining Baroque elements with Assyrian motifs. In other words, there was a lot going on, but the result, rather than one of overwhelming confusion was one of the most compelling (and totally entertaining) evenings of opera I have ever experienced. Much of that engrossing delight and interest was, I think, generated by the unfolding of a surface narrative—a good story that I was receiving and understanding for the first time as it unfolded.

In the American opera world generally, a dearth in the repertory of new operas and the seemingly obsessive dependence on the “standard” repertory has led to loss of the sense of surprise, of a journey into unknown territory, of the excitement of discovery based on unexpected revelations of plot or character or idea. We have so often lost one of the basic attractions and pulls of theater—an attraction and pull that seems to live on the surface but which can draw one in deeper and deeper and lead one beneath that surface into whatever depths are appropriate and available. And this pull is the simple storytelling question—“what’s going to happen next?”

I understand how sharing a bit of the plot line might be useful in selling the opera in a brochure or advertisement, but I believe suspense, curiosity and good old-fashioned dramatic storytelling are time-honored ways of drawing an audience member in. You notice I say “audience member.” I am opposed to thinking of “the audience” as an abstract entity to be educated or performed AT. Each person is different, with a totally different and unique set of emotions, experiences that interact with the stimulus emitted by the stage and the pit to produce a totally unique event.

Confusion sets in when we think of a performance as an event that is prepared and delivered by a group of artists to a more or less passive public that more or less receives it. In the end, a theatrical event doesn’t actually happen on the stage; it happens in the mind and heart and guts of each individual audience member.